Wasn’t so bad. Wasn’t so good. Second day was harder to stay awake in for me. The stuff was really abstract though trying to appear grounded. We’d chat about our matrix organization and got into the pros/cons of it, but there’s no use of us really talking about it – cause we can’t change it. It was more a support group of how to cope with it.
It was kind of strange, how the consultants would stress accountability and “owning” things, while they “owned” very little. That’s why I’d prefer they were Yahoo! employees and that they were given the task of finding out what leaders within the company are struggling with, so they then could address the problems. Right now, as we bring up issues in class, they’d faux-empathize and then just go on with their routine. They have topics to cover after all.
Oh – the book was – Now, Discover Your Strengths. And he’s got some putting your strengths to work book that is going to turn into another class that we’ll be offered at work. I’m going to try and get an internal strengths coach to get my team through some of this – just to see what it’s like. Except that she hasn’t responded to my email yet.
The instructors did turn me on to the fact that Lencioni’s got a new book out – around miserable jobs. So that might be a good read.
In the end, it is another class down with a tidbit or two here and there that’ll sneak up on me in the days to come. The one that stands out is that people don’t quit their organizations. They might join because of an organization, but they don’t quit it. They quit, because of their manager. Most of the time. So, sure, part of that is to impact on the people in the class how much of a difference they actually make to everyone working for them, but part of it just points to how even though we’re a huge company, we’re still very human.
Plus I met some interesting co-workers who’ve got nothing to do with media, which is kind of fun.
The ironic twist between class and the day to day stuff: we did a little exercise about the rewards people would want – most went with cash and time off. A few went for the longer term investment of “lunch with Jerry” or your group’s SVP type reward. Then, today, I find out that Jason or Dave are having lunch with Jerry. Nice!
My soon to be former group cheated and instead of taking the class just bought the books for everyone and had them take the test online and share their top 5 strengths with the group so we could see who excels in what areas.
What were your top 5?
Mine were: Responsibility, Arranger, Achiever, Command and Focus
I actually think I had around 20 tied for my top five.
But the computer could only spit out 5, so I got these:
Strategic: People strong in the Strategic theme create alternative ways to proceed. Faced with any given scenario, they can quickly spot the relevant patterns and issues.
Achiever: People strong in the Achiever theme have a great deal of stamina and work hard. They take great satisfaction from being busy and productive.
Maximizer: People strong in the Maximizer theme focus on strengths as a way to stimulate personal and group excellence. They seek to transform something strong into something superb.
Learner: People strong in the Learner theme have a great desire to learn and want to continuously improve. In particular, the process of learning, rather than the outcome, excites them.
Focus: People strong in the Focus theme can take a direction, follow through, and make the corrections necessary to stay on track. They prioritize, then act.